giant images in sigs?
  • drewcdrewc
    Posts: 236

    i'm looking at you tractor_boy ಠ_ಠ

  • The_Real_DealThe_Real_Deal
    Posts: 3,747
    I can't shrink it :s
    aka "Tractor Boy" Member # 003
    Former President & Director of Events
    Twitter : http://twitter.com/#!/604chrisdeal
    253 Row 2 Seat 3
  • The_Real_DealThe_Real_Deal
    Posts: 3,747
    OK, I have now deleted it. I don't think we want massive signatures on peoples profiles..if any???
    aka "Tractor Boy" Member # 003
    Former President & Director of Events
    Twitter : http://twitter.com/#!/604chrisdeal
    253 Row 2 Seat 3
  • drewcdrewc
    Posts: 236
    i wouldn't mind if we got rid of sigs completely, but Brett might feel otherwise as he's using it to push membership info.

    I'm open to suggestions.
  • piltdownmanpiltdownman
    Posts: 8,051
    Self serving, but i think keeping them really small is the best way to go imo. The size we have now is great. 
    AKA Brett :: #4 :: President :: Director of External Communications and Partnerships ::@piltdownman7:: Teal BCPlace : Sec 252 Row 2
  • YaletownshaneYaletownshane
    Posts: 240
    Drew. What if we kept it to text only.  Would that solve the concern?
    "If you're a burglar, it's no good poncing about outside somebody's house, looking good with your swag bag ready. Just get in there, burgle them and come out. I don't advocate that obviously, it's just an analogy." - Gas legend Ian Holloway.
Add a Comment