We're Not Even Top 400!
  • ynwasouthsideynwasouthside
    Posts: 1,658

    Though with TFC finishing above half the Premier League, I'm pretty sure Barber had something to do with this:

    http://www.iffhs.de/?10f42e00fa2d17f73702fa3016e23c17f7370eff3702bb1c2bbb6f28f53512

    MOD NOTE Moved to Whitecaps FO

    Post edited by piltdownman at 2012-07-04 10:41:42
    twitter: @cnclifford
  • bilibili
    Posts: 1,337

    Long way to top 25.

  • Neeskens1974Neeskens1974
    Posts: 1,605

    What a load of cobblers

    Member #1104
    Vak-G, 254 Soul Boys
    "Keep the Faith"
  • FynnskyFynnsky
    Posts: 1,801

    What data do they use for their rankings? TFC above LA Galaxy? That just seems silly.

    Sec 252 Row E | Member # 686 | twitter drunk - sober
  • capsclown123capsclown123
    Posts: 328

    don't listen or pay attention to iffhs. its just a load of bull. their club rankings are so unrealistic.

  • DannyBoyDannyBoy
    Posts: 1,094

    Seattle 107??? It has to be based on attendance then...

    Post edited by DannyBoy at 2012-07-04 10:24:37
  • At least the FIFA World Rankings have a proper system to tabulate points and what not, this is just ridiculous.

    Member #629 :: Proud Southsider since August 21st, 2011
    Football Writer for ChampionsLeague.ca, Forza Italian Football & SoccerSouls
    Twitter: @pgalindo16
  • prawnsideFCprawnsideFC
    Posts: 1,192

    Who cares, this list is complete BS, Sounders are better than Liverpool :))

    Member #910
  • Lord_BobLord_Bob
    Posts: 4,422

    DannyBoy said: Seattle 107??? It has to be based on attendance then...

    That would explain why Toronto is so high. Somebody asked MLSE what their attendance was and they said "a billion".

    Member no. 49 - Since 2009
    Maple Leaf Forever! - maple-leaf-forever.com
    > Brenton said:
    > Okay, I actually read the piece. It would appear that you aren't wrong.
  • xczimixczimi
    Posts: 1,828

    It's based on non-friendly International Club play

    http://www.iffhs.de/?bc83ccac3be8e00390b02fc5fdcdc3bfcdc0aec70aeed10a

    The Executive Committee of IFFHS meeting on 6th January 2007 in Salzburg (Austria) >decided to make the following changes to the methodology used to determine the >Club World Ranking, with effect from January 1st, 2007.

    UEFA Champions League: 14 - 7 - 0 points for win - draw - defeat UEFA Europa League: 12 - 6 - 0 points for win - draw - defeat Copa Libertadores: 14 - 7 - 0 points for win - draw - defeat Copa Sudamericana: 12 - 6 - 0 points for win - draw - defeat CAF Champions League: 9 - 4.5 - 0 points for win - draw - defeat CAF Confederations Cup: 7 - 3.5 - 0 points for win - draw - defeat AFC Champions League: 9 - 4.5 - 0 points for win - draw - defeat AFC Cup: 7 - 3.5 - 0 points for win - draw - defeat CONCACAF Champions League: 9 - 4.5 - 0 points for win - draw - defeat OFC Champions League: 5 - 2.5 - 0 points for win - draw - defeat FIFA Club World Cup: 14 - 7 - 0 (finals: 21 - 10,5 - 0) points for win - draw - defeat

    Reason: The widening difference in standard and performance between the two club >competitions within each continent, as well as the increasing number of matches >played in the less important competition of each continent.

    Club Secretary / Nerd Committee - member #124 - BC Place Section 251 Row F 101 --- http://www.xczimi.com
  • xczimixczimi
    Posts: 1,828

    So we won't crack this list until we start to play in CONCACAF Champions League.

    Club Secretary / Nerd Committee - member #124 - BC Place Section 251 Row F 101 --- http://www.xczimi.com
  • GhostdogGhostdog
    Posts: 517

    Neeskens1974 said: What a load of cobblers

    Shoe makers?

    From the Department of Redundancy Department
  • TunnelBanditTunnelBandit
    Posts: 1,123

    Ghostdog said:

    Neeskens1974 said: What a load of cobblers

    Shoe makers?

    As in Willie?

    OldFan said: A kick in the face from a football player is more tangible and may be better suited to coerce people.
  • Lord_BobLord_Bob
    Posts: 4,422

    xczimi said: It's based on non-friendly International Club play

    http://www.iffhs.de/?bc83ccac3be8e00390b02fc5fdcdc3bfcdc0aec70aeed10a

    Oh, so witchcraft.

    Member no. 49 - Since 2009
    Maple Leaf Forever! - maple-leaf-forever.com
    > Brenton said:
    > Okay, I actually read the piece. It would appear that you aren't wrong.
  • FynnskyFynnsky
    Posts: 1,801

    Thanks @xczimi, I was too lazy to RTFA

    Sec 252 Row E | Member # 686 | twitter drunk - sober
  • Ignore IFFHS - it's bunk.

    Deeper question: why do any of you care how the club is ranked?

    Member #15 - @BlueAnWhiteArmy on Twitter
    Member of VISTA (Victoria Independent Supporters' Trust Associated) - Canada's first supporters' trust
  • Lord_BobLord_Bob
    Posts: 4,422

    Blue_and_White_Army said: Ignore IFFHS - it's bunk.

    Deeper question: why do any of you care how the club is ranked?

    Because I want to cheer for a big club that wins big trophies! I want to go to Qatar and see people wearing Whitecaps jerseys! I want more expensive sponsorship deals so we can see more famous players!

    Member no. 49 - Since 2009
    Maple Leaf Forever! - maple-leaf-forever.com
    > Brenton said:
    > Okay, I actually read the piece. It would appear that you aren't wrong.
  • ClaytonAClaytonA
    Posts: 234

    FWIW, another take on this from a North American perspective using UEFA coefficients: soccermetrics.net/clubleague-coefficients/final-concacaf-clubleague-coefficients-2011-12

    These have as much meaning as the various power rankings, some of which are statistically based. They don't mean you'll actually win anything...