Jonathan de Guzman emphasizes that Hoilett's comments last year that JdG was looking into regaining Canadian citizenship in order to play for the CMNT were blown out of proportion. He has been and will remain committed to the Dutch.
Here's hoping the twat gets capped once in a qualifier and never plays for them again.
No wonder our program doesn't grow. People so willing to play elsewhere. If he is not 100% committed to Canada, I don't want him to, nor does he deserve to don the Red and White... Good riddance
barca99 said: Missing his shot at a World Cup. It's a long-shot with Canada, but he'll never get the call from Holland. Stupid move.
Agreed. If he wants to play for Holland...fine, but I just do not see it happening. Ill thought out on his part and a shame for Canada.
krisaug5 said: Ultimately I think if he ever "changes his mind" Canada should straight up REFUSE to let him play for us...
Yes...he is undeserving of the red and white indeed.
JdG2 moved to the Netherlands at age 13 or so - I don't mind if he thinks he's Dutch rather than Canadian. However if Canada is his sloppy seconds, then I don't want him to play for Canada.
Ditto for Toilett. He's the only footballer in history who can't play internationally for two years while he sorts out his club football. He doesn't want Canada? That's fine. We don't want him then.
People who support Canada's national teams should be represented by people who care as much about our country as we do. Anyone who doesn't shouldn't play for us.
At this point I would take Eduardo if he wanted to switch countries again.
There is something absolutely hilarious in him announcing that whilst wearing a Canadian jacket
Meh.
Can we change the title of this thread to "JdG2 remains committed to never playing International Football"
The telling quote, is that he actually figures he has a chance with the "new generation" of Dutch talent coming up, good luck son, you're going to need it.
He sent out the feelers by saying he was thinking Canadian again, and someone fed him the hope that he may be called up, thats fine, but he will never be anything more than a depth player at best for the dutch. Too bad, hes really getting some bad advice from somebody.
7semiao said: He remains committed to Holland in the same way I remain committed to Mila Kunis, or winning Lotto Max this week.
Brilliant.
Chris said: Jonathan de Guzman emphasizes that Hoilett's comments last year that JdG was looking into regaining Canadian citizenship in order to play for the CMNT were blown out of proportion. He has been and will remain committed to the Dutch. Here's hoping the twat gets capped once in a qualifier and never plays for them again.
It was actually Julian who got this started, not Hoilett. The comment about Junior was that Jonathan wanted Julian to put them in contact. As such, I find it weird that his own brother -with whom he's reportedly very close and had been very guarded up to this point- "blew things out of proportion."
krisaug5 said: Ultimately I think if he ever "changes his mind" Canada should straight up REFUSE to let him play for us...
Yeah , that would be great. But in another 3 years when he still hasn't played for Holland he may very well want to try Canada. I doubt anyone at the CSA would refuse him. Too bad though.
I would love to see one call up to some meaningless friendly, get a 2nd half substitution, and then never get picked by them again.
OldFan said:
krisaug5 said: Ultimately I think if he ever "changes his mind" Canada should straight up REFUSE to let him play for us...
Yeah , that would be great. But in another 3 years when he still hasn't played for Holland he may very well want to try Canada. I doubt anyone at the CSA would refuse him. Too bad though.
It's an inevitable cycle with these guys. "Okay, if he doesn't accept the call this time, this is his last chance." Repeat every single time until he has an infinite number of chances.
If Jono actually waved his Canadian passport around and said "I'm here when you need me, Stephen", I can promise that almost nobody would be telling him to fuck off.
OldFan said: I would love to see one call up to some meaningless friendly, get a 2nd half substitution, and then never get picked by them again.
I share your sentiment. (But on a pedantic side note, friendlies don't cap-tie players.)
Blue_and_White_Army said:
OldFan said: I would love to see one call up to some meaningless friendly, get a 2nd half substitution, and then never get picked by them again.
I share your sentiment. (But on a pedantic side note, friendlies don't cap-tie players.)
Might be wrong on this, but I think they do if you're over 21.
SAFC_Yank said:
Blue_and_White_Army said:
OldFan said: I would love to see one call up to some meaningless friendly, get a 2nd half substitution, and then never get picked by them again.
I share your sentiment. (But on a pedantic side note, friendlies don't cap-tie players.)
Might be wrong on this, but I think they do if you're over 21.
I believe that is the old Rule.. Being over the age of 21 has no significance any more
...complete with American spelling. :P
seathanaich said:
People who support Canada's national teams should be represented by people who care as much about our country as we do. Anyone who doesn't shouldn't play for us.
Just on the theoretical level (about as far as I can go as a Yank), I have some issues with the last bit. So, merely for discussion sake, a couple questions:
First, who comprises the "we"?
Second how do you know how much someone cares? It might be apparent in some cases, but if some guy has no choice but Canada, how do you know he "cares" and isn't just doing this because its his only option for international football?
To give a specific example, if somebody declares themselves in favor of Quebec sovereignty, would your standard bar them from playing for Canada?
Hey SAFC. Good questions.
I'd think the "we" is Canadian citizens: in this case, and in particular, the ones who pay the price of admission to watch international sporting competition. We are there partially because we like to watch sport, but partially because we have an emotional attachment to the team we are supporting.
I disagree with FIFA's current rules on eligibility, and that is, of course, a separate issue. You should be able to play for a country you were born in, or that you are a full citizen of after a certain period of residency (say, 5 years), and that's all. Where your parents were born should be irrelevant, let alone your grandparents. Hargreaves should have been unable to play for England unless he moved there and lived there for several years, just like Marc Bircham should have been unable to represent Canada. Same for the Scot, McCready, representing Ireland at the Euros this year. Since everyone has to use these rules, you can't blame the FA, CSA, or any other national association for trying to "poach" players from elsewhere - but that doesn't mean they are right, or appropriate.
If Canada is an athlete's "only option" and he doesn't care enough about his "Canadianness" to represent the country in sport, he has an option - don't show up. Pro footballers don't have to play for a political / social entity that they don't feel committed to representing. Maybe that's what Hoilett is currently doing, for all we know. National teams are, and should be, more than just the means for furthering the careers of pro players. Maybe an argument could be made that national team sport IS primarily a means for advancing careers in some purely or mostly amateur sports (women soccer players? Canadian male field hockey players? any other athlete who can't earn a full living at his sport?); but for pro footballers it certainly shouldn't be. International competition is used partially to advance pro careers, of course; but that shouldn't be the only reason a player participates in them. There should be some difference between the motivation to play for Whitecaps or Chelsea on one hand, and Canada or England on the other: it shouldn't be the same motivation (personal wealth / fame) that is the only factor in both situations. I don't think it's Pollyanna-esque or overly romantic to think this.
I wouldn't bar a Quebec separatist, or feel that he should be barred, for a few reasons. I think that exposure to other Canadian athletes would serve to decrease, not increase, separatist sentiment (that's what I notice in a military context). The other reason is that they shouldn't be denied the opportunity of international competition if FIFA rules limit them to playing for Canada (or Spain, for Catalans, etc). But if they DO suit up for the country, then they need to accept that they can't then wear or make pro-separatist slogans, because that's disrespectful to their teammates in their collective pursuit of victory. This isn't a lot to ask - it's no different than not being allowed to use the national team as a vehicle to promote your views on religion, politics, or any other subject inappropriate in that context. I think it's tacky to wave a Saskatchewan or Quebec flag if you win something as part of "Team Canada", but I wouldn't stop someone from doing so. I hope that clarifies what I meant with my comments above. Cheers.
Fair responses. Thanks.
The one "career advancement" claim that might be made ... to get a work permit in the UK as a non-EU citizen, you need caps with your national side. But that's a small exception.
And I questioned the "we" simply because there's a good portion of the citizenry in Canada (and the US) that doesn't care much.
I'm far more to the "functional" end on this argument, I've drifted toward a pseudo-libertarian view that citizenship should be used how an individual sees fit. I know that's far different from your take on it, but the answers were a good read. Appreciate you taking the time with it.
SAFC_Yank said:
And I questioned the "we" simply because there's a good portion of the citizenry in Canada (and the US) that doesn't care much.
I was going to say that "we" would be the football-supporting citizens. The same would apply to any national team in any nation. I have relatives in Norway & Denmark who could not care less about their national football teams. I refer to them as the "backward" part of the family.
Thanks SAFC. Citizenship means different things to diffrent people, but we still need to figure out some way of agreeing on what it means, or else it becomes meaningless. Fourth generation Canadians like me usually have a different view of it than someone who emigrated here, like my Dad's wife, who moved here from California in the last decade.
Athletes who pick national teams based on a mercenary basis always seem surprised when fans, who support teams based on an emotional basis, boo and criticise them as 'traitors'. They shouldn't be surprised: if they value things like money, fame, and opportunity more than nationality (as is their right) then they should be proud of the choice that they have made, not embarrassed by them. They're hurt because I boo? Tough. I'm hurt because they reject something I love. It's not hard to figure this stuff out. People who are getting paid big money to play a game should be able to tough it out in the face of booing fans. Cheers.
dhawk11 said: can we just end this thread and not talk about this guy anymore!!!!!
No. Certainly, though, we won't force anyone to either talk about him or read this thread.
Tommy Soehn is too old to play for Canada!
Ageist!
Perhaps OldFan meant Tommy should be running the Sr MNT.
TS for Holland!
I get the sense from that interview that Julian thinks he is WAY better than he actually is. He needs to step back and assess the situation: he struggled to get playing time on a team that was relegated, yet says he is too good to play in the segunda and wants a call-up from Holland??? Kid needs a reality check.
barca99 said: I get the sense from that interview that Julian thinks he is WAY better than he actually is. He needs to step back and assess the situation: he struggled to get playing time on a team that was relegated, yet says he is too good to play in the segunda and wants a call-up from Holland??? Kid needs a reality check.
He will get his reality check when another 3 years pass by and he isn't selected (or only gets one call up and that's it).
OldFan said:
barca99 said: I get the sense from that interview that Julian thinks he is WAY better than he actually is. He needs to step back and assess the situation: he struggled to get playing time on a team that was relegated, yet says he is too good to play in the segunda and wants a call-up from Holland??? Kid needs a reality check.
He will get his reality check when another 3 years pass by and he isn't selected (or only gets one call up and that's it).
If he didn't get it after being a spot starter for a relegated La Liga team, he never will. Remember that Jono, like many a professional athlete, is surrounded by hangers-on whose prime purpose is to whisper in his ear that he's the best.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!