We'll use this thread to discuss the weekly MLS Power Rankings
Whitecaps have started off at 12th for the 2012 instalment.
The Power Rankings Politburo has been a fan of Martin Rennie since the old Cleveland City Stars days, and we’re very, very fond of what he’s done with the ‘Caps roster so far. They still need some depth in central midfield, but the overhaul looks like a winning one.
Key Additions: Sébastien Le Toux (F), Lee Nguyen (M), Lee Young-Pyo (D), Darren Mattocks (F/M)
Key Losses: Jeb Brovsky (D), Shea Salinas (M)
First Game: March 10 vs. Montreal
Good stuff. Looks about where I'd rank them all (though Chicago seems high). The first part of the season will be quite interesting, as we get to see who's for real and who isn't.
Key Losses - Jeb Brovsky :)
Key losses - Nizar Khalfan :(
I remember seeing our preseason ranking last year at 14 or 15 and thinking we were jobbed by an American media conspiracy. Now I'm almost embarrassed at 12 given we haven't done shit in this league. Hopefully we'll be well surprised the other way. :)
In Rennie I trust.
Montana said: In Rennie I trust.
I know I was arguing with you on the other thread so I'm not saying this sarcastically but I like your optimisim even if I can't quite get there myself yet.
I actually see us around 8th to 10th. It is preseason rankings and with all we have done I would put us higher than 12th.
I'm an eternal optimist, so I like to give everyone the benefit of the doubt, until they prove me wrong.
I feel it in my bones, that Rennie is something special though, and he's going to lead us to success.
I'm genuinely more concerned about how soon it will be before another higher caliber club comes calling for him, than I am about him potentially failing here.
(That said, Rennie being an incredibly optimistic person himself, it could just be a matter of me wanting him to be the guy to take us to that next level)
Montana said: I'm an eternal optimist, so I like to give everyone the benefit of the doubt, until they prove me wrong.
I feel it in my bones, that Rennie is something special though, and he's going to lead us to success.
I'm genuinely more concerned about how soon it will be before another higher caliber club comes calling for him, than I am about him potentially failing here.
(That said, Rennie being an incredibly optimistic person himself, it could just be a matter of me wanting him to be the guy to take us to that next level)
FIFA™ Club World Cup? I JOKE!! /:)
I for one would prefer the league to underestimate us. It won't last, but for a while it'll be a modest advantage.
FootyMonster said: FIFA™ Club World Cup? I JOKE!! /:)
More than anything, I love that you "tm"'d FIFA, haha...
Montana said:
FootyMonster said: FIFA™ Club World Cup? I JOKE!! /:)
More than anything, I love that you "tm"'d FIFA, haha...
I love to mock the FIFA™ whenever I get the chance... whenever I've done anything football related that involves any FIFA™ collateral, they have been very explicit about usage of the logos and trademarking everything even in body copy.
12th is reasonable. I still think we might struggle in the beginning of the season due to the massive overhaul we've had, it'll be tough to gain chemistry and what not. Sure we have preseason, but getting chemistry and "match fit" in training is completely different than gaining that in matches. Still, I think we have a very good chance to make a massive impact this year.
Now that we have an unbalanced schedule a big worry is the amount of games we play against the strongest teams since a lot of the top ones are in the West (ie: Galaxy, Sounders, etc). So even if the Whitecaps prove to be better than the 12th best team in the league, their record may not reflect that.
ibeep said: Now that we have an unbalanced schedule a big worry is the amount of games we play against the strongest teams since a lot of the top ones are in the West (ie: Galaxy, Sounders, etc). So even if the Whitecaps prove to be better than the 12th best team in the league, their record may not reflect that.
True, but I would rather that be the measuring stick of our "position" within the league than a weaker east or what could present itself in a balanced schedule. Still I do agree that it will be harder, much harder to come out of the west.
ibeep said: Now that we have an unbalanced schedule a big worry is the amount of games we play against the strongest teams since a lot of the top ones are in the West (ie: Galaxy, Sounders, etc).
Shades of the Canucks in the 80s in the same division with Calgary and Edmonton.
That said, I think we're going to compete strongly for a playoff position. We have tunnel vision here, obviously, but the whole league is talking about us, and our upgrades this year. I don't know if we can finish ahead of Seattle, but I won't surprised to see us ahead of Portland. I would bet money that we'll be above San Jose and Chivas. Then the question will be how much Fake Salt Lake and Colorado have dropped off from last year.
seathanaich said:
ibeep said: Now that we have an unbalanced schedule a big worry is the amount of games we play against the strongest teams since a lot of the top ones are in the West (ie: Galaxy, Sounders, etc).
Shades of the Canucks in the 80s in the same division with Calgary and Edmonton.
That said, I think we're going to compete strongly for a playoff position. We have tunnel vision here, obviously, but the whole league is talking about us, and our upgrades this year. I don't know if we can finish ahead of Seattle, but I won't surprised to see us ahead of Portland. I would bet money that we'll be above San Jose and Chivas. Then the question will be how much Fake Salt Lake and Colorado have dropped off from last year.
Where have you heard this? I know very little about what people in Columbus, Houston, or Chivas are saying.
I love the optimism, but as has been discussed, I'm tend toward the realistic. If we compete for a play-off spot I will be quite happy. We have a ton of new players, no clear midfield leader, and an abundance of attacking talent but no true wide players other than Teibert. I'm pretty amazed and impressed at how much Rennie has done, but we'll play a lot of games against tough opposition.
Christopher said:
seathanaich said:
ibeep said: Now that we have an unbalanced schedule a big worry is the amount of games we play against the strongest teams since a lot of the top ones are in the West (ie: Galaxy, Sounders, etc).
Shades of the Canucks in the 80s in the same division with Calgary and Edmonton.
That said, I think we're going to compete strongly for a playoff position. We have tunnel vision here, obviously, but the whole league is talking about us, and our upgrades this year. I don't know if we can finish ahead of Seattle, but I won't surprised to see us ahead of Portland. I would bet money that we'll be above San Jose and Chivas. Then the question will be how much Fake Salt Lake and Colorado have dropped off from last year.
Where have you heard this? I know very little about what people in Columbus, Houston, or Chivas are saying.
Check out the MLS web site, and read the comments from fans attached to the articles there.
Fox Soccer has come out with their pre-season Power Rankings and the have us at 17th overall.......Perfect, as we are flying under the radar!! :D
This was made before we got Seba.
Who the hell is Lee Pyong-Ho? Nice research Fox.
With an unbalanced schedule it is stupid to have overall power rankings. They need 2 now, one for each conference. There is no longer any basis for MLS top team for the regular season.
Bad_Gones said: Who the hell is Lee Pyong-Ho? Nice research Fox.
They don't do any research for their news shows, why would they do it for a sports column?
CapsConvert said:
Bad_Gones said: Who the hell is Lee Pyong-Ho? Nice research Fox.
They don't do any research for their news shows, why would they do it for a sports column?
News shows? I thought we were talking about Fox. Aren't their pograms called Infotainment?
codes24 said: This must have been done before the Le Toux signing. They have Phili at #6 and us at #17 (which im fine with) but IMO phili will have a tough time even competing in the east. And if this guy talks about Salgado being a contributer I will not look into his readings in the future.
Hey now, Salgado has put on 20 pounds, and looked far better in training than he did last year. I'm not saying he'll be a starter or even a regular off the bench (especially with our attacking options), but he does look like he's improved and build up more strength. Remember, he's only 18.
Christopher said: Hey now, Salgado has put on 20 pounds, and looked far better in training than he did last year. I'm not saying he'll be a starter or even a regular off the bench (especially with our attacking options), but he does look like he's improved and build up more strength. Remember, he's only 18.
All valid points that still don't add up to him necessarily "being a contributor".
tim13 said: With an unbalanced schedule it is stupid to have overall power rankings. They need 2 now, one for each conference. There is no longer any basis for MLS top team for the regular season.
They get done for the NHL and NBA in various places, too. The general idea is to slice through all the unbalanced schedules and other extraneous things and analyze (or guess) who actually is best.
Conferences require these stupid things. The rest of the world just relies on table standings, like smart people.
Brenton said: Conferences require these stupid things. The rest of the world just relies on table standings, like smart people.
While I agree with you, and don't wish to defend Power Rankings, I feel I should point out that Table Standings only work at the end of the season. During, the effect is the same as having an unbalanced schedule.
So you would put Sunderland at the top of the Power Rankings before their Arsenal lost? They had the best record in the Premier League since O'Neill took over, but there they are, down in 8th/9th.
Power rankings might as well be a "record over the past three games" list. Wigan had a good run over a few games, would that have vaulted them up your Power Rankings? They're an easy way for lazy sports columnists to fill space.
Brenton said: So you would put Sunderland at the top of the Power Rankings before their Arsenal lost? They had the best record in the Premier League since O'Neill took over, but there they are, down in 8th/9th.
Power rankings might as well be a "record over the past three games" list. Wigan had a good run over a few games, would that have vaulted them up your Power Rankings? They're an easy way for lazy sports columnists to fill space.
That's precisely what power rankings are. They're a pointless exercise in filling column inches that are supposed to show who's on form. Some people probably would have had Sunderland atop the rankings, others would've seen that they were still not regularly beating the top 5 and had them not quite so high. It's subjective and pointless, but people read them, and it's a convenient way to do a summary of the league on a single page.
Keep in mind I'd always have Sunderland at the top of the power rankings. :)
Seriously, though, Chris nails it. They start discussion, and clearly they get read,because a lot of places use them. The Bellingham paper even does them for the local high school league. If you don't like them, the easiest thing to do is simply not bother with them.
For me, a power ranking of any sort, is simply a tool by which fans can discuss the state of their team, with regard to how they stack up against the competition.
I agree Montana , there just for fan's to compare and contrast with other teams. In regards to Omar Christopher , I just think he sits on the bottom of the depth chart behind the likes of Tan , Harris and Mattocks. I know mattocks plays a total different role but I still think he will be a better player then Salgado. You are right , he is still very young and training with Fullham has got to be a great help to his overall skill. I just think the Caps should have sent him on loan somewhere , I just dont see him getting enough "quality" minutes with our depth up front.
This has got me thinking. There are many Clubs across Europe who have a relationships with bigger clubs. The big club will provide young talent on loan, to be nurtured and developed, and reap the benefits once they achieve a certain level. While developing them, the smaller club gets more raw talent than they likely could afford. In some cases, players who aren’t good enough for the big club will be sold to the smaller club on a permanent basis. It’s a very unofficial partnership, but one that United have with Everton, Sporting CP, and Royal Antwerp FC. Other clubs have similar arrangements. I wonder if we might be able to someday form a similar relationship with a bigger European club? Is it even feasible with MLS' rules? I think I heard that Real Salt Lake have a burgeoning one with Real Madrid, and for a time, Barcelona thought about putting a club in Miami. Manchester United actually thought about buying Galaxy as well at one stage.
slamo said: Energie Coutbus?
Bayern Levancouver
Chris said:
slamo said: Energie Coutbus?
Bayern Levancouver
Werder Burnaby
Borussia Downtown
Also it would be Bayern Moncton (Or something that starts with an "m"), but BAYER LeVancouver... Leverkusen and Munich are Bayer and Bayern respectively. Bayer as in the medicinal company, and Bayern as in Bavaria the province in which Munich is located...
krisaug5 said: Also it would be Bayern Moncton (Or something that starts with an "m"), but BAYER LeVancouver... Leverkusen and Munich are Bayer and Bayern respectively. Bayer as in the medicinal company, and Bayern as in Bavaria the province in which Munich is located...

We know that, Kris, but we were just in a hurry and typing on our phones.
Adam Straith, Gagan Dosanjh, Jerome Baker, Kyle Porter, Julien Latendrese, Sahil Sandhu have all been sent on loan to Energie Cottbus. I want to say REB as well but, not - the point being we've had this relationship in the past.
Christopher said: This has got me thinking. There are many Clubs across Europe who have a relationships with bigger clubs. The big club will provide young talent on loan, to be nurtured and developed, and reap the benefits once they achieve a certain level. While developing them, the smaller club gets more raw talent than they likely could afford. In some cases, players who aren’t good enough for the big club will be sold to the smaller club on a permanent basis. It’s a very unofficial partnership, but one that United have with Everton, Sporting CP, and Royal Antwerp FC. Other clubs have similar arrangements. I wonder if we might be able to someday form a similar relationship with a bigger European club? Is it even feasible with MLS' rules? I think I heard that Real Salt Lake have a burgeoning one with Real Madrid, and for a time, Barcelona thought about putting a club in Miami. Manchester United actually thought about buying Galaxy as well at one stage.
I thought we were letting Philly develop talent for us?
slamo said: Adam Straith, Gagan Dosanjh, Jerome Baker, Kyle Porter, Julien Latendrese, Sahil Sandhu have all been sent on loan to Energie Cottbus. I want to say REB as well but, not - the point being we've had this relationship in the past.
Aren't these sort of upward loans?
It would be nice to have a team where we were comfortable sending guys for a year. Schaad mentioned San Antonio for Salgado the other day which I thought was a good idea.
Brenton said: We know that, Kris, but we were just in a hurry and typing on our phones.
WOW! Holding on a little tight are we?
To what? I was joking, as a response to a similar situation with Kris earlier.
I know, I was joking too...
I know you were joking. Don't get testy with me just because I was joking too.
Brenton said: I know you were joking. Don't get testy with me just because I was joking too.
=D> =D> touche bro! What were we talking about again? Oh Yeah, MLS Power rankings...
Agreed, its a wank fest for fans, and cheap editorial filler for writers.
It's not a Power Ranking poll, but it's a poll on the MLS, and I couldn't figure out where else to put this, so here it is:
WHICH CASCADIA TEAM WILL HAVE THE BEST RECORD IN 2012?
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!